How Stockfish Evaluates Chess Positions: A Deep Dive
What is Stockfish?
Stockfish is the world's strongest open-source chess engine. It's used by professionals, amateurs, and analysis platforms (including chess.koz.tv) worldwide. But how does it actually evaluate chess positions?
The Basics: How Chess Engines Think
Chess engines don't "understand" chess like humans do. Instead, they:
- Generate possible moves - List all legal moves in a position
- Search ahead - Explore move sequences (variations)
- Evaluate positions - Assign numerical scores to positions
- Select the best move - Choose the move leading to the best evaluation
Let's dive into each component.
Search: Looking Ahead
Alpha-Beta Search
Stockfish uses alpha-beta pruning, an optimized version of minimax search:
- Minimax: Assume both players play optimally
- Alpha-Beta: Skip variations that can't affect the final decision
This allows Stockfish to search much deeper than checking every possible move.
Depth and Speed
At depth 20, Stockfish might examine billions of positions. Modern chess engines on fast hardware can search 50+ million positions per second.
Selective Search
Not all moves are equal. Stockfish spends more time on:
- Captures and checks
- Moves that changed evaluation significantly
- Promising variations from previous searches
Evaluation: What Makes a Position Good?
Traditional Evaluation (Classical)
Older Stockfish versions used hand-crafted evaluation with components like:
Material Count
Pawn = 100
Knight = 320
Bishop = 330
Rook = 500
Queen = 900Positional Factors
- Piece activity and mobility
- Pawn structure (doubled, isolated, passed pawns)
- King safety
- Control of key squares
- Piece coordination
Game Phase
Different factors matter in opening vs. endgame. A centralized king is terrible in the middlegame but excellent in the endgame.
NNUE: Neural Network Evaluation
Modern Stockfish (including version 17) uses NNUE (Efficiently Updatable Neural Network):
What is NNUE?
A specialized neural network trained on millions of positions, designed to be extremely fast to evaluate.
How it Works
- The board position is converted to input features
- These feed through network layers
- The network outputs an evaluation score
Why NNUE is Better
- Learns patterns too complex to hand-code
- Picks up subtle positional factors humans identified but couldn't quantify
- Updates efficiently (only recalculates changed parts of the position)
Training
NNUE is trained on:
- Self-play games between strong engine versions
- Evaluations from very deep searches
- Millions of positions with known outcomes
Understanding Stockfish Output
Centipawn Evaluation
Stockfish reports evaluations in centipawns:
- +1.00 = White is ahead by 1 pawn worth
- -2.50 = Black is ahead by 2.5 pawns worth
- 0.00 = Roughly equal
Mate Scores
When mate is found:
- M5 = Mate in 5 moves
- -M3 = Getting mated in 3 moves
Principal Variation (PV)
The sequence of moves Stockfish considers best for both sides:
+1.25 Nf3 d5 e3 Nf6 d4 e6 Bd3 c5Depth and Accuracy
What Depth Means
Depth = number of half-moves (plies) the engine searches:
- Depth 10 = 5 moves for each side
- Depth 20 = 10 moves for each side
Higher Depth = More Accurate
At higher depths, Stockfish:
- Finds deeper tactics
- Evaluates positions more accurately
- Discovers long-term strategic factors
Diminishing Returns
Most of the benefit comes from the first 15-20 ply. Going from depth 20 to 40 rarely changes the evaluation dramatically except in very tactical positions.
Why Stockfish Isn't Perfect
Horizon Effect
Sometimes the best move requires seeing further than the search depth:
- A tactic works but loses to a counter-tactic at depth 25
- Depth 20 search thinks it's good
Fortress Positions
Stockfish might evaluate a drawn fortress as winning because it can't "see" that progress is impossible.
Positional Complexity
Some positions require understanding beyond pattern recognition - plans that unfold over 20+ moves in non-forcing sequences.
How chess.koz.tv Uses Stockfish
Server-Side Analysis
We run Stockfish 17 on our servers, so you get:
- Fast analysis without using your device's resources
- Consistent depth (15+ for all positions)
- Higher depth (20+) for cached positions from Lichess database
Multi-PV Analysis
We analyze the top 3 moves in each position, showing you alternatives, not just the single best move.
Move Classification
Based on centipawn loss, each move is classified:
| Classification | Centipawn Loss |
|---|---|
| Best/Brilliant | 0-10 |
| Good | 10-30 |
| Inaccuracy | 30-100 |
| Mistake | 100-300 |
| Blunder | 300+ |
Tips for Using Engine Analysis
Don't Just Look at the Best Move
Understand WHY it's best. What threat does it create? What does it prevent?
Consider Multiple Lines
The second and third-best moves are often perfectly playable. Understanding why they're slightly worse is valuable.
Context Matters
A "blunder" in a lost position might be the practical choice. The engine's best move might also lose, just more slowly.
Use Appropriate Depth
For most analysis, depth 15-20 is sufficient. Very deep analysis (30+) is only necessary for theoretical novelties or positions with long tactical sequences.
Conclusion
Stockfish combines sophisticated search algorithms with neural network evaluation to play near-perfect chess. Understanding how it works helps you use analysis tools more effectively.
When you analyze on chess.koz.tv, you're harnessing the same technology used by world championship contenders - completely free.
Start analyzing and see Stockfish in action on your games.
Ready to Put This Into Practice?
Analyze your games for free with Stockfish 17 - no signup required.
Start Analyzing Your GamesRelated Articles
Common Chess Mistakes at Every Level (And How to Fix Them)
Discover the most common chess mistakes players make at beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels, with practical advice on how to avoid them.
10 min read
Understanding Chess Accuracy Ratings: What the Numbers Really Mean
Learn what chess accuracy ratings mean, how they are calculated, and what constitutes a good accuracy score at different rating levels.
7 min read
Chess.com vs Lichess Analysis: Which is Better?
A detailed comparison of Chess.com and Lichess game analysis features, accuracy ratings, and how chess.koz.tv offers a free alternative.
6 min read